Latest Blog: Fireside Reading - 03/01/2024
-
-
CIO INSIGHTS
-
CIO INSIGHTS
- BACK TO CIO INSIGHTS BACK TO ARTICLES & INSIGHTS HOME
-
-
-
Investment Insights are written by Angeles' CIO Michael Rosen
Michael has more than 30 years experience as an institutional portfolio manager, investment strategist, trader and academic.
VALUATION
Published: 04-21-2015Most observers would agree that equities are rich (expensive, overpriced, etc.). Corporate profits are at record highs, and the forward price-to-(optimistic) earnings multiple on the S&P 500, at 17x, is the highest since 2004.
A favorite counterargument is a relative one: stocks may be expensive, but bonds are way more overvalued. With a 2% yield, the 10-year Treasury has a P/E multiple of 50x (taking the inverse of its yield). Of course, German bunds have an infinite P/E (with its negative yield). So stocks are the cheapest house in an expensive neighborhood.
That may be true, but this counterargument isn’t really a “counter,” i.e., stocks could still be expensive on their own even if other asset classes are more expensive.
The chart below (courtesy Barclays) shows the number of monthly observations of the S&P 500 at various forward P/E multiples (left y-axis). The subsequent average 12-month return is depicted by the black line (scaled to the right y-axis). And the range of subsequent 12-month returns at each P/E multiple is shown by the colors of each bar.
I like charts that convey a lot of information simultaneously (as this does), and this one leads me to three observations. The first two are pretty obvious/intuitive, the third, a bit more interesting:
- average future returns are higher when multiples are cheap than when multiples are expensive;
- negative forward returns can occur from both cheap and expensive multiples, although are more common when starting from an expensive base;
- forward returns have always been positive when multiples are in the middle range of valuation (as we are now).
I have not seen a rigorous study to explain this third point, but I’d speculate that the middle ground of valuation reflects an equilibrium environment that balances the macroeconomic risks of growth and inflation.
Of course, no law governs this observation, and the future path of equity prices is unknown. But in weighing the evidence, I see no compelling reason to deviate from our long-term strategy.
PRINT THIS ARTICLERELATED ARTICLES
-
Earthrise or Earthset: Thoughts on a Post-Pandemic World (Part 3) 06-02-2020
Source: NASAWeak economic growth and low investment returns are the prospects we discussed in the first two parts of ...
READ BLOG POST -
Petropolitics 12-02-2014
For the past few years, oil has held steady at around $100/barrel, as supply and demand were largely held in check. ...
READ BLOG POST -
Yogi 09-24-2015
Baseball, more than any other sport, by far, has drawn its share of colorful characters. I don't know why that is, but ...
READ BLOG POST
-
We strive build portfolios of best-in-class investment managers across all asset classes. If you would like to be considered for our portfolios, please contact us using our manager inquiries form.
- MANAGER INQUIRIES
-
SUBSCRIBE TO ANGELES' INSIGHTS
Get the latest investment information and stay on top of market trends.
SUBSCRIBE -
CONTACT US
SANTA MONICA
429 SANTA MONICA BLVD,
SUITE 650
SANTA MONICA, CA 90401
310.393.6300
GET DIRECTIONS -
NEW YORK
375 PARK AVENUE,
SUITE 2209
NEW YORK, NY 10152
212.451.9240
GET DIRECTIONS -
HOUSTON
5151 SAN FELIPE ST,
SUITE 1480
HOUSTON, TX 77056
713.832.3670
GET DIRECTIONS