• Michael Rosen
    • Investment Insights are written by Angeles' CIO Michael Rosen

      Michael has more than 30 years experience as an institutional portfolio manager, investment strategist, trader and academic.

    VALUATION

    Published: 04-21-2015

    Most observers would agree that equities are rich (expensive, overpriced, etc.). Corporate profits are at record highs, and the forward price-to-(optimistic) earnings multiple on the S&P 500, at 17x, is the highest since 2004.

    A favorite counterargument is a relative one: stocks may be expensive, but bonds are way more overvalued. With a 2% yield, the 10-year Treasury has a P/E multiple of 50x (taking the inverse of its yield). Of course, German bunds have an infinite P/E (with its negative yield). So stocks are the cheapest house in an expensive neighborhood.

    That may be true, but this counterargument isn’t really a “counter,” i.e., stocks could still be expensive on their own even if other asset classes are more expensive.

    The chart below (courtesy Barclays) shows the number of monthly observations of the S&P 500 at various forward P/E multiples (left y-axis). The subsequent average 12-month return is depicted by the black line (scaled to the right y-axis). And the range of subsequent 12-month returns at each P/E multiple is shown by the colors of each bar.

    I like charts that convey a lot of information simultaneously (as this does), and this one leads me to three observations. The first two are pretty obvious/intuitive, the third, a bit more interesting:

    • average future returns are higher when multiples are cheap than when multiples are expensive;
    • negative forward returns can occur from both cheap and expensive multiples, although are more common when starting from an expensive base;
    • forward returns have always been positive when multiples are in the middle range of valuation (as we are now).

    I have not seen a rigorous study to explain this third point, but I’d speculate that the middle ground of valuation reflects an equilibrium environment that balances the macroeconomic risks of growth and inflation.

    Of course, no law governs this observation, and the future path of equity prices is unknown. But in weighing the evidence, I see no compelling reason to deviate from our long-term strategy.

    PE

    PRINT THIS ARTICLE
    • Two (Percent) is a Sad Number

      Two (Percent) is a Sad Number 09-21-2020

      Last month, the Federal Reserve unveiled its new monetary framework, following an intensive 18-month review. The ...

      READ BLOG POST
    • Bring Home the Bacon

      Bring Home the Bacon 05-16-2019

      Bacon sure is popular. McDonald's, which probably has the best pulse on Americans' culinary tastes, introduced ...

      READ BLOG POST
    • Everybody Out'ta the Pool

      Everybody Out'ta the Pool 05-15-2018

      Markets work through the forces of demand and supply. This axiom applies to all markets, from housing to marriage (as ...

      READ BLOG POST
  • SEC/ADV | FORM CRS
  • © 2024 ANGELES INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC & ANGELES WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC
  • TERMS | PRIVACY
  • COPYRIGHT © 2024
    ANGELES INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC
    ANGELES WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC

Subscribe to our newsletter or follow us on LinkedIn for regular updates

Subscribe to our newsletter or follow us on LinkedIn for regular updates